Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oppidan Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The Oppidan Press

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Oppidan Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NMEDIA, WP:NNEWSPAPER. The only source in the article is a primary source, written by an early editor of the newspaper. Apart from that there is no significant coverage of the newspaper in secondary RS. The newspaper gets mentioned for its photo license attribution or its twitter account in other media articles regarding the activity in the campus. Also important to note is that campus newspapers are very rarely notable as per University article guideline. Though the article was created nearly 12 years ago, it was pretty clearly created by a COI account OppiPress (having a total of only 3 edits). The user also mentioned in its edit summary [1] not meant to be an advertisement. It's just filling a gap since other South African student newspapers have wiki articles, clearly pointing to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as the rationale for creating the article. Roller26 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Pretty much per the nom. It is a non-notable student newspaper. Lefcentreright ^{Talk | Contribs | Global} 21:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.